The national tendency: after the financial corruption in the Libyan state

The national tendency: after the financial corruption in the Libyan state

The deep rethinking of the Libyan politicians on the issue of financial corruption in the Libyan national state, in misappropriation funds, the disposition of many of funds in a random manner have been expressed repeatedly.

Looting of Libyan public money is a situation of abnormal behavior by people in the sovereign state efforts joint efforts aimed at the ruins and bankruptcy of the Libyan economic development.

Today is the call for the formation of an international committee to follow up the dealings of the Central Bank in both Tripoli and Al Bayda, is of a process of opening doors to attract foreign intervention in Libyan domestic affairs in a legal way.

Thus, it’s a serious political work to increase the collapse of the Libyan state and put Libya under the eyes of state tutelage.

We know that every dilemma, problem, and misfortune requires studies and analyzes that work to find the right solutions in the formation of the first independent Libyan state.

The distinguishes between external ambitions and interests of the States and the road map of the United Nations envoy to Libya and the superficial emotion and false love for the homeland Libyan politicians for the clinic Libyan national does not return to the right position among the world of nations.

The collapse of the Libyan state politically and so on, we are supposed to re-understand the project of the modern Libyan national state, as one of the models of the era of modernity experienced by the revolution of the glorious seventeenth of February.

Where is the Libyan crisis in this first configuration of the Libyan national state?

The draft political agreement had to serve national unity, and it has repeatedly violated the agreement of the Moroccan agreement makers in 2015.

Despite the attempts of the United Nations, Arab, African organizations and neighboring countries of Libya commitments in finding peaceful solutions among the political poles of the conflicting power.

The replacement of political pole faces with other faces of the same mentality and leaving the old faces guilty without accountability increases the crisis in Libya and the Libyan political situation is pressing the decline of the national economy and in a decline in the concept of national unity.

The Libyan national state lies in the existence of the Libyan national institutions governed by the legitimate constitution, this does not mean that it is merely a legal framework, but rather a political framework that works for the stability of the Libyan state, which takes the present form in connection with the history of Libya after the independence of 1951 from the United Nations.

The independence of Libya from 1951 was not just a historical coincidence but independence was a work of unifying the Libyan state in its territories.

A united Libyan people in this social heritage, and today, Libya are inc roadmap the orbit of national reconciliation with the help of the whole world with internationally agreed plans and roadmap.

But where is the imbalance between the two things in the structure of the Libyan society was it in the United Nations resolution of 1970, which called for armed intervention against the former Arab Jamahiriya in 2011 or the seven lean years that Libya has been through since the new Libyan state after the toppling of the old regime?

Therefore, the events in Libya were not events of "Libyan national modernity" to enable us to talk about people inside and outside the corridors of the Libyan state, a kind of revulsion at their work and their potentials that obstruct the national political transition to a stable and secure state of Libya with independent national sovereignty.

The solution to the Libyan conflict does not come from the outside as much as it is rather a collision and confrontation between the Libyan political poles at home and abroad, and in the face of their special problems related to Libyan wealth and the lifting of arms and the sharing of power through the Libyan constitutional reference.

More internal conflicts are undermining national self-sufficiency in confronting the proliferation of weapons, plundering Libyan funds and wealth, and further destruction of Libyan cities and villages under the pretext of our war ongoing terrorism, which has not ended and we have not yet decided to end it.

The historical interest of the Libyan people is due to the unity of the Libyan soil, here lies one of the secrets of our historical weakness of the Libyan state, the struggle to achieve Libya's independence from the colonial powers and to divide the Libyan state and preserve it as it is today of fragmentation and regression.

Agreements are changing rapidly from the United Nations to the presence of ineffective attempts on the ground in Libya because they do not find any resonance and response in one case even after reaching an agreement with a Council of six members in addition to three members of the Presidential Council.

For example, many cases of foreign countries that have been subjected Libya in the course of talking from the Arab Gulf and Arab neighbor of Libya to accept the road map plan for UN Special Envoy Ghassan Salama.

Fear of losing the spirit of the agreement and conditions that came in the Libyan National Agreement and stability of the county.

Today's apprehension stands in front of different types, such as the divergent interests of the United States of America in disrupting Libyan affairs, although the focus on illegal migration from Libya to Europe has delegated parallel governments to Libyan monolithic sovereign institutions.

But Italy is working to strengthen the capabilities of the Libyan Coast Guard to be able to address the phenomenon of illegal migration, which depends on the phenomena of departure and bribery, and Italy wants to stop its launch to its territory, that is why Italy is strengthening of the possibility of returning migrants back to Libya.

But the approach of the Libyan state comes in building the national state and its capabilities from within; this does not negate the fundamental differences between the Libyan political poles, which are in conflict with the Libyan regime between the forces in the Libyan east and the west.

Today's conflict is between Hafter and Al-Sarraj, and everyone hopes to implement the political agreement, it is just a matter of proposals from abroad to provide lessons on how to move from one introduction to the alternatives presented by the United Nations in the three-phase roadmap.

Today, Libya is among the worst, although Libya rose from the previous rule and returns to its own history in the deepest and most integrated of the Libyan constitutional legitimacy and the anthem and the Libyan national flag.

I will only say that the major problem facing Libya is not from the outside, but from the inside in the inclusion and circulation of the historical weakness of Libya as a result of the formation of the modern and integrated state of Libya.

In the past, the Libyan national state originally nationalized the old classes and replaced them with good layers of tribes, loots and the great merchants learned from the current situation and the former supervisors of the Libyan national army.

In order to get rid of this blatant class in Libya, we must return to the constitutional national legitimacy and the alliance for Libya, this is the traditional alliance that serves the Libyan cause so that we can get out of the Libyan crisis that we see today in Libya.

Ramzi Halim Mavrakis

A businessman based in the United States of America